IN RE TRUSLOW

Patent Appeal No. 4175.

104 F.2d 203 (1939)

In re TRUSLOW.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 5, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffery, Kimball & Eggleston, of New York City (H. G. Kimball and O. W. Jeffery, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office which affirmed a decision of the examiner rejecting, in view of the prior art all of the process claims 8 to 10 inclusive in an application for an alleged invention for improvement in the manufacture of yarn. Several apparatus claims were allowed.

Claim 8 is illustrative of the involved subject matter and is as follows: "8. The process of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases