1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 170 (1939)
 

GUMBART v. WATERBURY CLUB HOLDING CORPORATION

No. 4147.

28 F.Supp. 170 (1939)

GUMBART v. WATERBURY CLUB HOLDING CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 31, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Bronson, Lewis & Bronson, of Waterbury, Conn., for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendants for a directed verdict at the end of the plaintiff's case.

The complaint contains two causes of action designated as two counts. The first count is based upon alleged negligence on the part of the defendant, The Waterbury Club, in the operation of the Club, leased by it from the other defendant, The Waterbury Club Holding Corporation. The second count is based upon alleged nuisance.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases