1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 34 F.Supp.
  5. 34 F.Supp. 124 (1939)
 

LEWIS v. UNITED AIR LINES TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Nos. 44, 64, 72, 106.

34 F.Supp. 124 (1939)

LEWIS v. UNITED AIR LINES TRANSPORT CORPORATION et al., and three other cases.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

Rehearing Denied January 4, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Day, Berry & Howard, of Hartford, Conn., and Harold E. Drew, of Derby, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Wiggin & Dana, of New Haven, Conn., for defendant United Aircraft Corporation.

Pond, Morgan & Morse, of New Haven, Conn., for defendant United Air Lines Transport Corporation.

Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, Conn., for defendant Bethlehem Steel Co.

HINCKS, District Judge.

This matter is now before the court upon the application of the United Aircraft Corporation under Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for a determination of the validity of Aircraft's special defense, contained in Paragraphs 27 and 28 of its answer to the crossclaim, addressed to Paragraphs 28, 29 and 30 of both counts of the cross-claim.

Briefly stated the question thus raised is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases