1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 125 (1939)
 

LOOPER v. COLONIAL COVERLET CO.

No. 4.

29 F.Supp. 125 (1939)

LOOPER v. COLONIAL COVERLET CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

August 16, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Carmack Waterhouse, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Charles A. Noone, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.

DARR, District Judge.

The plaintiff has interposed a motion to require the defendant to answer certain interrogatories which were not answered but objected to.1

For reasons set out in the opinion filed this day in the case of the Boysell Co. v. Colonial Coverlet Co., Inc., D.C., 29 F.Supp. 122, it is my judgment that the question is to be determined under the regulations of Rule 33, of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases