1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 105 F.2d
  5. 105 F.2d 47 (1939)
 

MULLEN v. CANFIELD

No. 7182.

105 F.2d 47 (1939)

MULLEN v. CANFIELD et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

April 3, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Leahy and James F. Reilly both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

William A. Gallagher, George Monk, and Austin F. Canfield, all of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice and STEPHENS and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Petitioner is a member of the bar of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia. Respondents are the members of a Committee on Grievances of the Police Court of the District of Columbia. In proceedings instituted by the committee in the Police Court, petitioner was required to appear before that court and show cause why he should not be held in contempt "or" why he should not be suspended from practicing before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases