1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 86 (1939)
 

PENMAC CORPORATION v. ESTERBROOK STEEL PEN MFG. CO.

27 F.Supp. 86 (1939)

PENMAC CORPORATION v. ESTERBROOK STEEL PEN MFG. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 31, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic P. Warfield, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Howson & Howson, of New York City (Charles H. Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for defendant.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this cause is:

1. That Claims Nos. 1, 2, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 36 and 37 of United States Patent No. 1,866,072, and Claims Nos. 6, 7, 10, 12 and 13 of United States Patent No. 1,928,042 are valid and were infringed by the defendant herein.

2. That Claims Nos. 4, 15, 16 and 21 of United States Patent No. 1,700,255, Claim No. 33 of United States Patent No. 1,700,246, and Claim No. 7 of United States Patent No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases