PINOVER v. THE BALTIMORE PURE RYE DISTILLING CO.

No. 9154.

103 F.2d 1018 (1939)

Arthur PINOVER v. The BALTIMORE PURE RYE DISTILLING CO., a Corporation.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McFarland, Scheinman & Sisenwein, and David Blonder, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Baldwin Robertson, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellee for dismissal of the appeal herein for failure of appellant to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing the transcript, there being no opposition to said motion by appellant, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases