1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 1010 (1939)
 

BECKERT v. HALLEY

No. 8980.

104 F.2d 1010 (1939)

Harriet T. BECKERT, Appellant, v. S. M. HALLEY et al., Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

On Rehearing May 25, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Boykin and George F. Seideman, both of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.

William L Kerr, of Pecos, Tex., and John Sayles, of Abilene, Tex., for appellees.

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Like Miss Meacham's case, Meacham v. Halley, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 967, this day decided, this was a suit for cancellation, and in the alternative for damages, based on the claim that plaintiff had been defrauded into releasing to Halley a ten acre lease.

The facts in this case, with a few unimportant differences,1 are the same as those in Miss Meacham's case.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases