1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 1020 (1939)
 

PIEST v. TIDE WATER OIL CO.

27 F.Supp. 1020 (1939)

PIEST v. TIDE WATER OIL CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 27, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis F. Glaser, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Charles Pratt Healy, of New York City, for defendants.

COXE, District Judge.

The complaint in this action alleges an agreement under which the plaintiff was to receive commissions on renewal sales. I think this is sufficient against a motion to dismiss. Whether the Statute of Frauds has any application is at least doubtful, see Warren Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. Holbrook, 118 N.Y. 586, 23 N.E. 908, 16 Am.St.Rep. 788; but in any event the question should be presented by affirmative defense under Rule 8 (c), 28 U. S.C.A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases