1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 77 (1939)
 

WHITE v. REACH

26 F.Supp. 77 (1939)

WHITE v. REACH et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 10, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marco J. Shemaria, of New York City (Hyman R. Friedman, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Milbank, Tweed & Hope, of New York City (John A. Kelly, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Charles Dallas Reach.

Milton Eisen, of New York City, for defendants Ryan, Norman, and Noblette.

GODDARD, District Judge.

Several motions are made respecting the above entitled case. The first is a motion by plaintiff to amend the complaint so as to allege that the defendant, Reach, is a citizen of New Jersey, which is consented to. Another motion is made by the defendant, Reach, and joined in by defendants, Norman, Ryan and Noblette, to vacate plaintiff's notices of examinations before trial pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases