1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 1003 (1939)
 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. WABASH APPLIANCE CORP.

No. 7962.

29 F.Supp. 1003 (1939)

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. WABASH APPLIANCE CORPORATION et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

October 30, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howson & Howson, of New York City (Hubert Howson, Merrell E. Clark, and Alexander C. Neave, all of New York City, and John H. Anderson, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and Darby & Darby, all of New York City (Paul Kolisch, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a motion to punish the defendants for the violation of a decree relating to the infringement of Pipkin patent no. 1,687,510. The patent was held valid and infringed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 2 Cir., 93 F.2d 671.

It appears that the plaintiff desires an adjudication of the issue of infringement rather than the imposition of a fine; and likewise, though the defendants contend that a different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases