1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 990 (1939)
 

HOLLAND v. MAJESTIC RADIO & TELEVISION CORPORATION

27 F.Supp. 990 (1939)

HOLLAND v. MAJESTIC RADIO & TELEVISION CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 27, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold R. Zeamans, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Walter C. Lundgren, of New York City, for defendants Majestic Radio & Television Corporation, Richard B. Scandrett, Jr., Miner W. Tuttle, Walter Chalaire, and Bernard Phillips.

Strange, Myers, Hinds & Wight, of New York City (Roger Hinds and William J. Cahill, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Thomas A. Edison, Inc.

Joe E. Daniels, of New York City, for defendant R.C.A. Mfg. Co. Inc.

HULBERT, District Judge.

These are three separate motions addressed to the amended complaint based upon (1) lack of jurisdiction of subject matter, and (2) failure to state claims upon which relief can be granted.

The original complaint was dismissed upon a similar challenge and with some slight changes in verbiage and the inclusion of paragraphs 7-A, 9-A, 9-B, 11-A, 18-A and 26-A the amended complaint sets up two alleged causes of action, (1) purporting to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases