1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 27 F.Supp.
  5. 27 F.Supp. 987 (1939)
 

MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO. v. HARRISBURG T. CO.

No. 4159.

27 F.Supp. 987 (1939)

MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO. v. HARRISBURG TRUST CO.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

June 23, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Braddock & Sohn, of Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiff.

Snyder, Hull, Leiby & Metzger, of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant.

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a motion for a more specific statement of defendant's affidavit of defense, and for a more specific statement of defendant's counter-claim. Prior to these motions, the case was considered by this court on a motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and an opinion filed thereon, August 6, 1938, dismissing the petition. 24 F.Supp. 269. The facts are fully set forth in that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases