1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 33 F.Supp.
  5. 33 F.Supp. 68 (1939)
 

BROOKS v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 246.

33 F.Supp. 68 (1939)

BROOKS v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, E. D. New York.

November 2, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Hutton, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Denis M. Hurley and James J. Manogue, both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, of Brooklyn, N. Y., Enoch E. Ellison, Atty. for Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., Vine H. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Morris K. Siegel, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, for the United States.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This action is brought by plaintiff, an enlisted man in the United States Navy, to recover the sum of $350 for reenlistment allowances under the basic pay act known as the Joint Service Pay Act of June 10, 1922, 37 U.S.C. § 16, 37 U.S.C.A. § 16. The pertinent part of Section 16 reads as follows: "* * * an enlistment allowance equal to $50 multiplied by the number of years served in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases