DIRKES v. EITZEN

Patent Appeals Nos. 3947, 3948.

96 F.2d 849 (1938)

DIRKES et al. v. EITZEN. SAME v. DECKER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 31, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene C. Brown, of Washington, D. C., and Marvin J. Reynolds and Newman F. Presson, both of New York City, for appellants.

Gustav Drews, of New York City (Hans v. Briesen, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


JACKSON, Associate Judge.

These are appeals from decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, in two interference proceedings, which awarded priority to the senior parties Eitzen and Decker, respectively.

In appeal No. 3947, the interference arises between an application of appellee, Eitzen, serial No. 338,065, filed April 17, 1934, which is a renewal of his application filed February 7, 1929, and a patent, No. 1,968,818, issued to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases