MULFORD v. SMITH

No. 97.

24 F.Supp. 919 (1938)

MULFORD et al. v. SMITH et al. (UNITED STATES, Intervener).

District Court, M. D. Georgia, Valdosta Division.

October 7, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. J. Little, of Valdosta, Ga., for plaintiffs.

Franklin & Eberhardt (O. W. Franklin and H. C. Eberhardt), of Valdosta, Ga., for original defendants.

John S. L. Yost, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and T. Hoyt Davis, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Macon, Ga., for the United States.

Before SIBLEY, Circuit Judge, and DEAVER and KENNAMER, District Judges.


SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Some of the reasons supporting the foregoing Conclusions of Law may profitably be stated.

It is mainly urged for plaintiffs that the part of the Act in controversy is not a regulation of interstate and foreign commerce but is a regulation of all sales of tobacco by producers, whether for export from the State or for manufacture and consumption within the State, and whether large or small; and that the real purpose and effect of it is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases