ARMSTRONG CORK CO. v. UNITED CORK CO.

No. 5433.

24 F.Supp. 913 (1938)

ARMSTRONG CORK CO. v. UNITED CORK CO.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 17, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J. (Stebbins, Blenko & Parmelee, of Pittsburgh, Pa., by Walter J. Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff.

McCarter & English, of Newark, N. J. (Noah A. Stancliffe, Fritz v. Briesen, and Hans v. Briesen, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


FAKE, District Judge.

This is a patent suit in which plaintiff seeks an accounting and injunctive relief for the alleged infringement of the Bertelsen patent No. 1,607,047, relating to the manufacture of artificial cork and assigned to plaintiff. The defendant denies infringement and contends that if the patent is so construed as to include within the scope of its claims any process heretofore or now used by defendant then, in that event, the said claims are void...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases