1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 24 F.Supp.
  5. 24 F.Supp. 69 (1938)
 

SLAYMAKER LOCK CO. v. REESE

No. 9555.

24 F.Supp. 69 (1938)

SLAYMAKER LOCK CO. v. REESE.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 3, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Coyle and Harris C. Arnold, both of Lancaster, Pa., and Dowell & Dowell, Benj. B. Dowell, and Wm. S. Hodges, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Christian E. Charles, of Lancaster, Pa., and Richard E. Babcock, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

My conclusion is that the bill must be dismissed. I will briefly state the facts as I understand them, and add a statement of my reasons for the conclusion.

The bill states a number of causes of action. First is the alleged infringement of two patents for the mechanical structure of a padlock; second, the alleged infringement of two design patents; third, the alleged infringement of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases