1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 901 (1938)
 

IRVING v. KERLOW STEEL FLOORING CO.

25 F.Supp. 901 (1938)

IRVING et al. v. KERLOW STEEL FLOORING CO.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 29, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bartlett, Eyre, Scott & Keel, of New York City (Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Richard Eyre and A. Parker-Smith, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Milton, McNulty & Augelli, of Jersey City, N. J. (John C. Kerr and George F. Des Marais, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CLARK, District Judge.

The usual search for that needle in the haystack of patent jurisprudence, the spark of genius in the improvement. The plaintiff company describes itself as the oldest and largest manufacturer of open metallic flooring. This modest assertion finds confirmation in the file of alleged anticipating patents. All but one of these patents is owned by the corporate plaintiff and of these two are the brain children of this corporation's president, Mr...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases