1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 28 F.Supp.
  5. 28 F.Supp. 880 (1938)
 

ROSOFF TUNNEL CORPORATION v. HIGGINS

28 F.Supp. 880 (1938)

ROSOFF TUNNEL CORPORATION v. HIGGINS.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 7, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freedman & Greenberg, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Lamar Hardy, of New York City (Charles J. Nager, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and to dismiss the third cause of action on the ground that the Court has not jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof.

The plaintiff does not oppose this motion to dismiss the third cause of action; therefore, the only question is as to the sufficiency of the complaint.

Plaintiff's contention is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases