1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 62 (1938)
 

MULLEN v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO.

No. 20426.

25 F.Supp. 62 (1938)

MULLEN v. EASTERN TRANSP. CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April 19, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham E. Freedman, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Krusen, Evans & Shaw, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

We granted leave to submit a supplemental Brief. This has now been submitted.

This controversy grows out of two characteristics of the professional mind. One is its conservatism. Counsel here are Proctors in Admiralty. In consequence the case is as it is viewed by Admiralty lawyers. The other is the love for fine distinctions. All lawyers are metaphysicians.

The plaintiff is a seaman. He was a member of the crew of defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases