1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 93 F.2d
  5. 93 F.2d 761 (1938)
 

CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE CO. v. PILLSBURY

No. 8374.

93 F.2d 761 (1938)

CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE CO. et al. v. PILLSBURY et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 4, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Britton McConnell and Claude F. Weingand, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Hal Hughes and Ralph E. Lazarus, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Pillsbury.

David A. Fall, of San Pedro, Cal., for appellee Hunter.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

On February 9, 1935, Alfred E. Hunter (hereafter called claimant) was employed by the Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Company (hereafter called the employer), in maritime employment, upon navigable waters of the United States. To secure payment of compensation to its employees under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, § 1 et seq. 44 Stat. 1424-1446, as amended, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950, the employer had, pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases