PER CURIAM.
Appellant's chief reliance in its petition for rehearing seems to be a vehement controversion of the statement in the court's opinion, that the appellant "devised the warehouse receipt forms and issued them as sufficient to effect coverage."
Since this was stated arguendo, and not as the ground of the decision, and since the petition presents no sufficient reason for its granting, we should, but for appellant's expressed "astoundment" at the statement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
