1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 96 F.2d
  5. 96 F.2d 675 (1938)
 

IDEAL ROLLER & MFG. CO. v. SUTHERLAND PAPER CO.

Nos. 7391, 7392.

96 F.2d 675 (1938)

IDEAL ROLLER & MFG. CO. v. SUTHERLAND PAPER CO. SUTHERLAND PAPER CO. v. IDEAL ROLLER & MFG. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 13, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Paul Parker, of Chicago, Ill. (Parker, Carlson, Pitzner & Hubbard, C. Paul Parker, and Lincoln B. Smith, all of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellants.

Thos. H. Sheridan, of Chicago, Ill., (Sheridan, Davis & Cargill, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellees.

Before SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and FORD, District Judge.

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

The patentee owner and his licensees brought suit for injunction and to recover damages for infringement of patent No. 1,594,356, issued on August 3, 1926, to Arthur B. Davis. The patent discloses an inking roll and method of and apparatus for treating ink-rolls of printing presses, its main purpose being that surfaces of such rolls may be renewed. The Sutherland Paper Company is the user of the three

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases