1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 21 F.Supp.
  5. 21 F.Supp. 742 (1938)
 

ACME CARD SYSTEM CO. v. REMINGTON RAND B. SERVICE

No. 1785.

21 F.Supp. 742 (1938)

ACME CARD SYSTEM CO. v. REMINGTON RAND BUSINESS SERVICE, Inc., et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

January 7, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bartlett, Poe & Claggett (J. Kemp Bartlett), of Baltimore, Md., and Blum & Jacobson (Henry S. Blum), of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Emory, Beeuwkes, Skeen & Oppenheimer (John H. Skeen), of Baltimore, Md., and Bean, Brooks, Buckley & Bean (Barton A. Bean, Jr.), of Rochester, N. Y., for defendants.

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit, and the questions which are the subject of this opinion arise on exceptions to a report by the special master. Since the litigation leading up to this report has been protracted and involved, the following chronology is deemed necessary:

On March 20, 1933, this court, pursuant to its written opinion filed in this proceeding, 3 F.Supp. 254, entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases