IN RE DAY & MEYER, MURRAY & YOUNG

No. 147.

93 F.2d 657 (1938)

In re DAY & MEYER, MURRAY & YOUNG, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 3, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burnstine, Geist & Netter, of New York City (George E. Netter, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants Horn and Winthrop.

Charles Segal, of New York City, for appellants Segal and Bresnick.

Snider, Duke & Landis, of New York City (David B. Landis, of New York City, of counsel), for debtor.

Searle, James, Crawford & Tyng, of New York City (Theodore W. Monroe and Sewell T. Tyng, both of New York City, of counsel), for Bondholders Protective Committee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Leave to appeal was granted, and the case is properly here. Meyer v. Kenmore Granville Hotel Co., 297 U.S. 160, 56 S.Ct. 405, 80 L.Ed. 557. The appeal is from an order confirming the plan of reorganization and, although the bondholders have not formally intervened, they can be heard. In re Barclay Park Corp., 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 595.

Appellant bondholders own $19,000 out of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases