In re MISSOURI PAC. R. CO.
THOMPSON
v.
TERMINAL SHARES, Inc., et al.
District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 27, 1938.
September 27, 1938.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jerome N. Frank, of New York City, and Ernest A. Green, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Samuel B. Jeffries, Arthur E. Simpson, and Paul F. Plummer, all of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Benjamin F. Edwards.
James S. Simrall and Henry L. Jost, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants North Kansas City Bridge & R. Co., North Kansas City Development Co., Parkside Land Co., Guinotte Land Co., Kansas City Ferry Co., and North Kansas City Land & Improvement Ass'n.
Godfrey Goldmark, of New York City, I. N. Watson, Elton L. Marshall, and Henry N. Ess, all of Kansas City, Mo., and Edwin J. Bean, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Guaranty Trust Co. of New York.
R. L. Douglas and Brown, Douglas & Brown, all of St. Joseph, Mo., for defendants Union Terminal Ry. Co. and St. Joseph Belt Ry. Co.
William B. Cockley, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Emmet T. Carter, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants John P. Murphy, Henry A. Marting and John J. Murray, trustees, etc.
William B. Cockley, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Emmet T. Carter, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Alleghany Corporation.
Godfrey Goldmark, of New York City, I. N. Watson, Elton L. Marshall, and Henry N. Ess, all of Kansas City, Mo., and E. J. Bean, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Marine Midland Trust Co.
William B. Cockley, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Emmet T. Carter, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Terminal Shares, Inc.
Godfrey Goldmark, of New York City, I. N. Watson, Elton L. Marshall, and Henry N. Ess, of Kansas City, Mo., and E. J. Bean, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant Douglass & Co.
District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
MOORE, District Judge.
Guy A. Thompson, Trustee for Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, commenced this action, which is termed "An Ancillary Dependent Bill in Equity" to enforce an equitable lien for injunction and other relief, filing such bill on June 24, 1936, in the reorganization proceedings of the Missouri Pacific Railroad pending in this court.
The bill alleges that four certain contracts between Missouri Pacific Railroad Company and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.