1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 706 (1938)
 

SIEROCINSKI v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

No. 20828.

25 F.Supp. 706 (1938)

SIEROCINSKI v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

November 10, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond A. White, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

C. Brewster Rhoads and Abel Klaw, both of Philadelphia, Pa. (Montgomery & McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

KALODNER, District Judge.

Defendant under Rule 12 (e), Rules of Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, has moved for an order requiring the plaintiff to file a more definite statement of claim.

Plaintiff instituted a trespass action to recover for injuries which he suffered when a dynamite cap, manufactured and distributed by the defendant, exploded while the plaintiff was crimping it. Plaintiff did not purchase the dynamite cap...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases