1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 96 F.2d
  5. 96 F.2d 607 (1938)
 

BARRINGER v. LILLEY

No. 7765.

96 F.2d 607 (1938)

BARRINGER et al. v. LILLEY et al. In re WINDSOR SQUARE DEVELOPMENT, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Amended June 13, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. H. Mackay, of San Francisco, Cal., and John L. Gust, of Phœnix, Ariz. (Ellinwood & Ross and Kibbey, Bennett, Gust, Smith & Rosenfeld, all of Phœnix, Ariz., of counsel), for appellants.

Thomas W. Nealon and Alice M. Birdsall, both of Phœnix, Ariz., for appellee Lilley.

Thomas Armstrong, Jr., R. William Kramer, J. E. Morrison, Walter Roche, and Frank J. Duffy, all of Phœnix, Ariz., for appellee Central Arizona Light & Power Co.

Cunningham & Carson, of Phœnix, Ariz., for appellee Grose.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

Prior to December 17, 1928, appellant Margaret B. Barringer was the owner of a tract of land located in Maricopa county, in or near Phœnix, Arizona, bounded on the east by Seventh street, on the north by Colter street, on the west by Center avenue, and on the south by Camelback road. On that date a warranty deed to the property was executed by Mrs. Barringer in favor of appellant Phœnix Title & Trust Company, without consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases