1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 472 (1938)
 

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. CATARACT CHEMICAL CO.

No. 2218.

25 F.Supp. 472 (1938)

B. B. CHEMICAL CO. v. CATARACT CHEMICAL CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

October 25, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of New York City, and John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Albert R. Henry, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of certain patents. The Bill is in the usual form. Defendant answering denies infringement and sets up certain prior art patents. The questions presented are the sufficiency of Paragraph 13 of the Amended Answer; the relevancy and propriety of certain interrogatories; and the sufficiency of Bills of Particulars.

Paragraph 13 of the original Answer was ordered stricken by the court. An Amended Answer has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases