1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 23 F.Supp.
  5. 23 F.Supp. 454 (1938)
 

TUBIZE CHATILLON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 43515.

23 F.Supp. 454 (1938)

TUBIZE CHATILLON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

May 31, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valentine B. Havens, of New York City (Charles B. McInnis and Olcott, Paul, Havens & Wandless, all of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff.

Guy Patten, of Washington, D. C., and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert N. Anderson and Fred K. Dyar, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff corporation paid the stamp taxes involved in this case. A refund claim was timely filed. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue denied the claim and this suit was brought within the statutory period provided for so doing.

The facts have been stipulated. Insofar as pertinent in an opinion they are as follows:

The Tubize Artificial Silk Company of America and the American Chatillon Corporation were Delaware corporations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases