1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 100 F.2d
  5. 100 F.2d 355 (1938)
 

CLOISTER PRINTING CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 49.

100 F.2d 355 (1938)

CLOISTER PRINTING CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 5, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedman & Friedman, of New York City (Hyman R. Friedman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (David McKibbin, 3rd, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant sues to recover moneys paid for taxes in compromise of an assessment made against it under § 609 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 264, ch. 209, 26 U.S.C.A. following § 1481. The Revenue Act imposes a tax on articles sold by a manufacturer, producer or importer of games or parts of games or articles commonly or commercially known as sporting goods. Appellant is said to be a manufacturer

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases