1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 94 F.2d
  5. 94 F.2d 357 (1938)
 

SHULL PERFORATING CO. v. CAVINS

No. 8291.

94 F.2d 357 (1938)

SHULL PERFORATING CO., Inc., v. CAVINS et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 10, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank L. A. Graham, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Hamer H. Jamieson, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree in a suit brought by appellees charging infringement of patent No. 1,917,211 issued to O. A. Cavins. The master found that claims 18 and 24 of the patent were valid and were infringed. The court sustained the finding, and entered an interlocutory decree for an injunction and an accounting.

Appellant contends that the patent is invalid because anticipated by previous patents, and that if...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases