MERRIAM v. WIMPFHEIMER


25 F.Supp. 405 (1938)

MERRIAM v. WIMPFHEIMER et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 20, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krause, Hirsch & Levin, of New York City (Sidney Gross and Elliott Krause, both of New York City, of Counsel), for plaintiff.

Kellogg, Emery & Innes-Brown, of New York City (J. R. Kochendorfer, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant E. W. Bliss Buildings, Inc.

Meyer Halpern, of New York City (Charles Seligson, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants Sol Wimpfheimer, Otto D. Wimpfheimer, and Thorner Manufacturing Co. Inc.


WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The first two causes of action stated in the complaint have been settled and, therefore, I have only to consider the third.

I hold that the third alleged cause of action as against Otto D. Wimpfheimer and Sol Wimpfheimer and Thorner Manufacturing Company, Inc., must be dismissed, without costs.

I have already dismissed the complaint as to E. W. Bliss Buildings, Inc., without costs.

I. My subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases