1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 346 (1938)
 

SCHICK DRY SHAVER v. MOTOSHAVER, INC.

No. 1274-M.

25 F.Supp. 346 (1938)

SCHICK DRY SHAVER, Inc., et al. v. MOTOSHAVER, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

November 12, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Gibbs McAdoo and E. Walter Guthrie, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Abraham Tulin and Reginald Hicks, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Oscar A. Mellin, of Oakland, Cal., and Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, by Kenneth K. Wright, of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

McCORMICK, District Judge.

Upon decision of the motion for preliminary injunction, this court followed the majority opinion of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Schick Dry Shaver, Inc., v. Dictograph Products, 89 F.2d 643. We conceived it to be our duty, in the then state of the record, to subordinate our own opinion as to the scope of the Schick primary patent No. 1,721,530 to the decision of the appellate court, Schick Dry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases