1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 29 F.Supp.
  5. 29 F.Supp. 329 (1938)
 

PUTNAM v. CARMEL

29 F.Supp. 329 (1938)

PUTNAM et al. v. CARMEL.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 14, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry B. Rook, of Newark, N. J., for plaintiffs.

Joseph Schottland, of New York City, for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of three design patents for buckles, namely, No. 96,501, issued August 6, 1935; No. 96,999, issued September 24, 1935, and No. 97,742, issued December 3, 1935. The complaint also charges the defendant with unfair competition in the manufacture and sale of alleged infringing buckles.

The principal defense is invalidity.

The design of No. 96,501 is polygonal in shape, with a rib at the crest of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases