IN RE SAMPSEL

Patent Appeals No. 3943.

95 F.2d 253 (1938)

In re SAMPSEL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 28, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray, Sackhoff, Zugelter & Paddack, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Walter F. Murray, of Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner denying the patentability of two claims, numbered, respectively, 40 and 41, contained in appellant's application relating to automatic stokers, filed March 30, 1931. Four claims stand allowed. The rejected claims read:

"40. In combination a furnace, a stoker, a motor, an electric circuit for the motor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases