1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 96 F.2d
  5. 96 F.2d 227 (1938)
 

HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. v. SWINDELL BROS.

No. 4273.

96 F.2d 227 (1938)

HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. v. SWINDELL BROS., Inc. (AMSLER-MORTON CO., Intervener).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 21, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney F. Parham, of Hartford, Conn., and Edwin F. Samuels, of Baltimore, Md. (William J. Belknap, of Detroit, Mich., and Robson D. Brown and Lloyd G. Bates, both of Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.

William B. Jaspert, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Lawrence C. Kingsland, of St. Louis, Mo. (Cook & Markell, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal in a patent infringement suit involving Mulholland reissue patent, No. 17,263, Ingle patent, No. 1,583,046, and Mulholland patent, No. 1,840,463, all relating to lehrs for the annealing of glassware. The judge below held that, as the patents related to improvements in a crowded art, they should be narrowly construed and that, when so construed, they were not infringed by the lehr of defendants. See Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases