1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 25 F.Supp.
  5. 25 F.Supp. 293 (1938)
 

DYSART v. REMINGTON RAND

Nos. 3978, 3979.

25 F.Supp. 293 (1938)

DYSART et al. v. REMINGTON RAND, Inc. DYSART v. SAME.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 11, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Butler, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

George H. Cohen, of Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

THOMAS, District Judge.

These are two companion actions seeking damages from the defendant for the use of a patent claimed to have been the property of one Birney Dysart. Both actions are based upon the same contract. No. 3978 is brought in behalf of the patentee's heirs, and No. 3979 by the executrix of his estate. Both cases were originally brought in the state court. Removal to this court was predicated on diversity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases