1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 96 F.2d
  5. 96 F.2d 198 (1938)
 

THOMAS B. BISHOP CO. v. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

No. 8532.

96 F.2d 198 (1938)

THOMAS B. BISHOP CO. v. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearings Denied April 22, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sterling Carr, of San Francisco, Cal., and H. F. Prince and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Percy C. Heckendorf, Dist. Atty., C. C. Ward, and David S. Licker, all of Santa Barbara, Cal., for appellee Santa Barbara County.

Faries & McDowell, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Chase et al.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant sued in ejectment to recover a parcel of land claimed to have been included in a patent from the United States, granting to its predecessor the Rancho Los Dos Pueblos in Santa Barbara County, California. This appeal was taken from an adverse judgment.

The trial court made findings, including as part of them the patent and the plat of survey of the Rancho. The evidence, aside from the patent and plat, is not before us, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases