REIDENBACH v. A. I. NAMM & SON

Nos. 8368, 8369.

25 F.Supp. 235 (1938)

REIDENBACH v. A. I. NAMM & SON. SAME v. KOPS BROS., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 3, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. E. Warland, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Merrell E. Clark and William J. Barnes, both of New York City, for defendants.


INCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the alleged inventor and the owner of a patent, brings these two suits for alleged infringement. The first suit is against the retailer, the other is against the manufacturer. The issue is the same in both suits. The evidence in one is applicable to the other. The parties duly agreed to try both suits together. One decision therefore will decide both suits although there must be separate decrees.

Plaintiff's patent was applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases