LEIBING AUTOMOTIVE DEVICES v. WILDERMUTH

No. 8320.

23 F.Supp. 223 (1938)

LEIBING AUTOMOTIVE DEVICES, Inc., v. WILDERMUTH.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 5, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strauch & Hoffman, of Washington, D. C., and Ward, Crosby & Neal, of New York City (William A. Strauch and Rex P. Mulligan, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Gifford, Scull & Burgess, of New York City (George F. Scull, Harold F. Watson, and H. H. Hamilton, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


BYERS, District Judge.

In this cause the parties are reversed, in effect, to those in 23 F.Supp. 214, in that the defendant there is the plaintiff here, and the plaintiff there, being the manufacturer of the accused structure in this case, has assumed and conducted the defense, and will be referred to, for convenience, as the defendant.

The patents involved are: Leibing No. 2,026,947, applied for May 31, 1932, granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases