HURD v. SMITH

Patent Appeal No. 3942.

97 F.2d 147 (1938)

HURD v. SMITH.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 31, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Donnelly, of Washington, D. C. (Eugene E. Stevens, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

The Firm of Charles W. Hills, of Chicago, Ill. (Charles W. Hills, Jr., Charles F. Meroni, and Thomas J. MacKavanagh, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

There is here brought before us for review the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority to the party Smith in an interference declared between applications of the respective parties for patents for a locking device to hold a hub cap in place on the wheels of a vehicle such as an automobile.

A single count is involved, the text of which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases