LLOYD MOORE, INC. v. SCHWARTZ

No. 41.

26 F.Supp. 188 (1938)

LLOYD MOORE, Inc., et al. v. SCHWARTZ.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

December 27, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry S. Ambler, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Carr & Krauss, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


DICKINSON, District Judge.

There are two grounds upon which this motion is based. One is that the complaint discloses no cause of action, the other that this Court has no venue jurisdiction of the action. We will consider them in inverse order because if the case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction the other ground need not be discussed. It will be noted that there is a legal plaintiff and a use plaintiff. The legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases