HARTNESS v. UNITED STATES

No. 6571.

23 F.Supp. 171 (1938)

HARTNESS v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, E. D. Oklahoma.

May 4, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. L. Brook, of Muskogee, Okl., for plaintiff.

Daniel Dillon, Atty. for Department of Justice, and C. W. Miller, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty., for the United States.


RICE, District Judge.

The defendant United States of America filed herein its motion to dismiss, for the reason that the plaintiff's action is barred by the statute of limitation and this court is without jurisdiction to hear said cause. Thereafter, the following stipulation was entered into by the attorneys for plaintiff and defendant:

"It is stipulated and agreed by counsel for respective sides that Clarence Hartness was inducted into the military service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases