1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 96 F.2d
  5. 96 F.2d 87 (1938)
 

MAYTAG CO. v. EASY WASHING MACH. CORPORATION

Nos. 230, 231.

96 F.2d 87 (1938)

MAYTAG CO. v. EASY WASHING MACH. CORPORATION. SAME v. HURLEY MACH. CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 4, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace R. Lane, of Chicago, Ill., Oscar W. Jeffery, of New York City, and Clarence J. Loftus, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

William H. Davis and Dean S. Edmonds, both of New York City, George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill., Charles W. Riley, of New York City, and Edgar F. Beaubien, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

These suits are for infringement of patent No. 1,866,779 for a gyrator type of washing machine. We held this patent invalid as to claims 231 and 26;2 also, claim 38, for a method claim, in our determination of a suit in Maytag Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 86 F.2d 625. In addition to these claims (23 and 26), claim 293

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases