MULLONEY v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON

No. 7197.

26 F.Supp. 148 (1938)

MULLONEY v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 5, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin R. Chesley, of Portland, Me., and Francis H. Farrell, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Palmer, Dodge, Barstow, Wilkins & Davis, of Boston, Mass., for defendants National Shawmut Bank of Boston, Walter S. Bucklin, and Joseph E. O'Connell.

Philip B. Buzzell, and Hemenway & Barnes, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant Webster & Atlas Nat. Bank.

Deland & Rockwood and Frank S. Deland, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant United States Trust Co.

John T. Noonan, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Norman W. Bingham, Jr., Neil Leonard, and Bingham, Dana & Gould, all of Boston, Mass., for defendants First National Bank of Boston, Old Colony Trust Co., and Philip Stockton.

Charles M. Rogerson, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

John L. Hall, Robert Proctor, Maxwell E. Foster, Philip H. Rhinelander, and Choate, Hall & Stewart, all of Boston, Mass., for defendants Merchants Nat. Bank of Boston, Second Nat. Bank of Boston, State Street Trust Co., New England Trust Co., National Rockland Bank of Boston, Alfred L. Ripley, Allan Forbes, and Thomas P. Beal.

John M. Cunningham, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Herbert W. Scott.

John T. Noonan, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.


BREWSTER, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on defendants' motion for further particulars. The motion was filed June 28, 1938, pursuant to Rule 21 of the Law Rules of this Court. There are in all 19 defendants, including 12 banking associations, the Boston Clearing House, an unincorporated association, and 6 individuals who are officers in the above.

The plaintiff's declaration is long and prolix, and is replete with vague allegations of misrepresentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases