1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 94 F.2d
  5. 94 F.2d 1018 (1938)
 

PENICK & FORD v. INTERNATIONAL PATENTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

No. 6314.

94 F.2d 1018 (1938)

PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PATENTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, and Corn Products Refining Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

February 10, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., Percival H. Truman and Sherman R. Barnett, both of Chicago, Ill., and Hastings, Stockly & Duffy, of Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City, Owen N. Elliott, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After full argument, study of exhaustive briefs, and careful consideration had, we find no error in the court's reasoning and the conclusion reached. As a restatement of the case would simply be a lengthy opinion by this court and in substance an effort to put in different language what has already been fully and satisfactorily said by the court below in its expansive opinion, 15 F.Supp. 1038, we limit ourselves to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases