IN RE URFER

Patent Appeal No. 3902.

94 F.2d 985 (1938)

In re URFER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 7, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McConkey & Smith, of Washington, D. C. (Stephen Cerstvik, of East Orange, N. J., and N. D. Parker, Jr., of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner which rejected appellant's claims 30 to 33, inclusive (all of the claims).

Claim 30 is illustrative and reads as follows: "30. In an aircraft having a plurality of internal combustion motors, an indicator arranged so as to be visible to the pilot of the aircraft and adapted to indicate when the motors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases