NIEMAN v. SOLTIS

No. 20600.

24 F.Supp. 1014 (1938)

NIEMAN v. SOLTIS.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

October 15, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. P. McFadden, of Bethlehem, Pa., for plaintiff.

Smith & Paff, of Easton, Pa., for defendant.


KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit at law by the receiver of a closed bank against a stockholder to recover an assessment of the par value of his stock. An affidavit of defense has been filed, and this rule challenges its sufficiency.

The statement of claim alleges the defendant's ownership of the stock, the closing of the Bank, the appointment of several successive conservators and receivers (the last of whom is the present plaintiff), the assessment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases